TSA Agents Grope Without Consequence

May 30, 2011 No Comments

Apparently knowingly and recklessly groping airplane passengers, in the name of safety, is fair game in our country.

The Texas government attempted to pass a bill prohibiting TSA agents in airports from intentionally touching flyers’ private areas while examining for safety. Unfortunately, the bill that was cleared by the Texas House of Representatives on a unanimous vote was withdrawn on Tuesday after causing quite the stir in the federal government. Threatening to prohibit any flights from taking off with the bill passed, Washington won this battle. If the TSAs were not allowed to pat down, then no airplane could take off.

The bill would have proposed charging TSA agents who, “intentionally, knowingly, or recklessly [touch] the anus, sexual organ, buttocks, or breast of the other person, including touching through clothing, or touching the other person in a manner that would be offensive to a reasonable person.” I don’t think any “reasonable” person would appreciate having their anus recklessly  touched.

I could see the danger with the risks involved surrounding an unproper full body search of suspicious passengers, but the bill does not say “all touching.” It distinctly proclaims that “intentional, knowingly, or reckless touching” is prohibited. Touching that is extraneous and painful or overly invasive in a sexual manner is really what the issue is here. The federal government’s concern with airport security and safety is understandable, but I also understand that being groped and fingered by a man or woman whom I do not know sounds quite a bit like molestation or sexual assault. There is a fine line between intentional and unintentional inappropriate touching, so this bill adds more pressure for TSAs to proceed with sexual caution.

Also, with advances in safety technology, X rays are used in airport security now, allowing almost anything hidden in or around the body to be quickly detected. Why is there still a need for body cavity searches and invasive touching if we have asexual machines to do it instead? There may not be a reason soon and I think this is why the bill was attempted.

Safety is obviously a priority when it comes to flying, but should not be at the expense of our comfort and private parts. Creating a bill criminalizing TSA agents who take the job a bit too far is only looking out for our personal safety. Their job is to search for weapons or drugs, not take liberties.

Contact the author here: crazycolleen@morningquickie.com

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , News

Leave a Reply

(required)

(required)


The University Men’s Non-Wanker Centre

My attention was drawn this week to an article about the reaction at a Canadian university to proposals to...

The Patriarchal Overlords And Your Shoes

Airport security. Bloody nuisance. Also a conspiracy designed to subjugate women. Allow me to elaborate. Despite flying quite a...

Lack Of Female Film-Makers Is Not Gender Bias

The Cannes film festival has kicked off this week with controversy over the lack of films made by women...

Why Macho Men Are Sexy

Dear Madame X, I seem to be only attracted to men who are macho assholes. I like them at...

Fifty Years Of A Clockwork Orange

When A Clockwork Orange was published in 1962, the term sexualized violence wasn’t in use. The distinction between sexualized...

Why Manly Skincare Is Better

Skincare. Not so very long ago, a man would have been mocked mercilessly for using just the word, never...

Laptop Bags: Too Big And Too Sparkly

Laptop bags; conspiracy of the patriarchal overlords. Oh yes. I am a woman with hands. The average-sized hands of...

Body Hair Is The Pits! Seriously?

The British nation stood shocked this morning. No, it was nothing to do with us being back in recession...

Mooncup Menstrual Cup